<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>MoldRiskIQ — News and analysis</title>
    <link>https://moldriskiq.com/news</link>
    <atom:link href="https://moldriskiq.com/news/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Reporting and analysis on mold science, moisture risk and the data behind both.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Two of the five water-damage mold species are not wet-building organisms at all</title>
      <link>https://moldriskiq.com/news/water-damage-species-xerophile-error</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://moldriskiq.com/news/water-damage-species-xerophile-error</guid>
      <description>The five-species water-damage panel is usually presented as a list of organisms that indicate a wet building. Two of the five are extreme xerophiles that grow in conditions drier than most fungi tolerate — and that is the most useful thing about the panel, not a footnote.</description>
      <dc:creator>MoldRiskIQ Editorial</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NOAA retired the billion-dollar disasters database. It was the best water-damage record we had.</title>
      <link>https://moldriskiq.com/news/noaa-disaster-database-retired</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://moldriskiq.com/news/noaa-disaster-database-retired</guid>
      <description>NOAA's billion-dollar disasters catalogue was never a mold statistic, but it was the longest consistent record of large-scale wetting events reaching American buildings. It stopped updating after 2024, and anyone citing it now is citing a closed archive.</description>
      <dc:creator>MoldRiskIQ Editorial</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EPA says ERMI is not validated for judging your house. Almost nobody selling it says so.</title>
      <link>https://moldriskiq.com/news/epa-ermi-not-validated</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://moldriskiq.com/news/epa-ermi-not-validated</guid>
      <description>The Environmental Relative Moldiness Index is real science, developed by EPA researchers and peer reviewed for the job it was built to do. That job was comparing populations of houses. It is now routinely sold as a verdict on one house, and EPA has said plainly that the validation does not stretch that far.</description>
      <dc:creator>MoldRiskIQ Editorial</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
